Posts Tagged ‘green consumerism’
Creating Accountability on Climate Change
Yesterday, President Elect Obama vowed to place climate change at the top of his agenda – a move I applaud. His strongly-worded remarks were both refreshing and reassuring, a sharp contrast against the refusal of administrations, Democratic and Republican, over the last several decades to address climate change in any meaningful fashion.
Impacts of climate change can be felt across borders and across every sector of civic society. We are living through the dreadful awareness of what happens when we try to manage inter-connected systems with conventional, unconnected governance models. Who knew that American real estate speculators could help unravel the world’s banking system? “Environmental crisis” is poised to replace “economic crisis” in news headlines around the world; and for this crisis, no “bail out” plan will rescue us, or future generations, from the real damage being done to our physical environment.
In addition to Washington putting climate change at the top of its agenda, another complementary, yet elementary, part – if you want a real solution to climate change – is at the cash register you visit every day. As powerful and relevant as the government is, for-profit business has a huge, even outsized impact on the question of climate change. CEOs – yes, that demonized group characterized by greed and self dealing – have the potential to foster huge, positive impact on climate change. Businesses buy and sell along a value chain that stretches across the globe, from developed economies to developing economies. CEOs can and do have a huge impact on climate change, in the way they run their businesses, in the choices they make about materials, energy use, chemical use, transportation. And if you want to influence those choices – you, the citizen consumer – can. Imagine if you insisted on organic content in the food you purchase. Lo and behold – an entire industry springs into action, to deliver organic produce. Imagine if you demanded that Timberland or Nike or the Gap use organic cotton, rather than pesticide laden factory-farmed cotton. Just imagine.
I am not saying government doesn’t have an important role in solving climate change – clearly it does. But if we expect President Elect Obama or Congress to solve the issues facing the environment alone, we’re fooling ourselves. It will take more effort to reverse the damage being done to our environment worldwide. Citizen consumers have the power to force change, by holding brands and businesses to a higher standard – and in turn many businesses must change they way they currently operate. With everyday “votes” on what goods and services you buy, you can create a different kind of accountability on climate change. Consumers can use their purchasing power to hold corporate America responsible for doing more than “working on” climate change.
Jeff Swartz
President & CEO, Timberland
Less is More
Today’s blog entry by Collin Dunn over at Huffington Post reminds us being an eco-conscious consumer isn’t all about buying organic — or hybrid — or energy-efficient “stuff” — it’s also about buying less stuff and making sure the stuff we do buy is more durable than disposable.
Green is good, no doubt about it … but it’s so easy to get caught up in our Earthkeeping desire and responsibility to purchase nothing but the greenest that we sometimes run the risk of buying things we don’t really need. As Dunn points out, “Recycling is great; buying green is great; but they both take energy and resources that can be saved by having something that will last a lifetime.”
For a sharper, deeper dive into the environmental impact of our production and consumption habits — and how we can change those habits – visit Annie Leonard’s Story of Stuff website. If you haven’t seen it, Leonard’s Story of Stuff video offers a thought-provoking glimpse at how the consumable goods cycle impacts our lives (including the staggering statistic that 99% of the “stuff” we buy gets disposed of after a mere six months):
You’ll never look at your iPod the same way again.
Do Small Steps Count Toward Saving the World?
We were interested to read this recent post on WorldChanging, which poses a question about the role of green consumerism in creating truly notable environmental change.
The debate centers around a report issued by WWF which suggests that “marketing” approaches to creating environmentally-responsible behavior change are inadequate, and that the consumer-friendly message that small and painless steps can ultimately lead to larger-scale impact is misguided.
The WWF report and subsequent blog post led to a healthy debate on whether small steps can actually save the world. Comments following the WorldChanging blog post ranged from “there’s nothing small about individuals taking personal responsibility” to “the huge problems facing us cannot be solved with the use of ‘greener’ bulbs.” Following WorldChanging’s post, Treehugger also weighed in, stating, “To deride a small step as useless is to deride a single vote as ineffective, but that is what will make change happen.”
Clearly, a hot topic for Earthkeepers everywhere … and we think that’s a good thing. The more voices lending insight and opinion to the discussion, the more we collectively learn … and the more ideas we generate about how to solve the problem. Our thanks to WorldChanging for stirring the pot.
